I was talking to a client the other day who was asking me about my approach with Pilates as she thinks my style is a bit of a physiotherapy approach. She also wanted to know about my view on the classical method, which led to an interesting discussion about the differences between classical and contemporary Pilates.
Classical vs. Contemporary Pilates: Understanding the Differences
Pilates is a movement system that has evolved significantly since Joseph Pilates created it in the early 20th century. Today, two primary styles dominate the Pilates world: classical and contemporary. While both approaches share the same foundational principles, they differ in structure, philosophy, and application. As someone trained in contemporary Pilates but who also practices classical weekly, I appreciate the strengths of both methods, and I love to mix both styles in my teaching.
Let’s explore their key differences and why they each offer something valuable.
What is Classical Pilates?
Classical Pilates stays true to Joseph Pilates’ original system, which he called “Contrology.” It follows a set sequence of exercises performed in a specific order, with a strong emphasis on precision, control, and flow. The method remains deeply rooted in Pilates’ original equipment designs, such as the Reformer, Cadillac, and Wunda Chair, often using traditional spring settings.
Key Characteristics of Classical Pilates:
- Structured Sequences: Exercises are performed in a predetermined order, designed to build strength and control progressively.
- Emphasis on Flow: Movements transition seamlessly from one to the next, maintaining a dynamic rhythm.
- Traditional Equipment: Pilates’ original apparatuses are used with minimal modifications.
- Rigorous Technique: Focuses on executing exercises with precision, engaging the powerhouse (core) effectively.
What is Contemporary Pilates?
Contemporary Pilates builds upon the classical method by incorporating modern biomechanics, physiotherapy principles, and movement science. This approach offers greater flexibility in modifying exercises to suit individual needs, making it more adaptable for rehabilitation, sports conditioning, and injury prevention.
Key Characteristics of Contemporary Pilates:
- Adaptability: Exercises can be modified or progressed based on a person’s ability, making it accessible to all fitness levels.
- Integration of Modern Science: Includes insights from physiotherapy and movement research to optimize function and prevent injuries.
- Variety in Equipment and Props: Classical apparatuses and props, such as resistance bands, stability balls, and foam rollers, are used.
- Individualised Approach: Allows for customisation to address specific needs, such as back pain, postural imbalances, or athletic performance.
Which One is Better?
There is no definitive answer; it depends on your goals and preferences. Classical Pilates offers a rigorous, structured method that builds discipline and strength, while contemporary Pilates provides a more flexible, therapeutic approach that adapts to individual needs.
Personally, I love practising classical Pilates for its challenge, flow, strength and structure, but I also appreciate the versatility of contemporary Pilates, especially when working with clients who have injuries or movement restrictions. Both methods complement each other beautifully, offering different paths toward improved movement, strength, and well-being.
Finding the Right Approach for You
If you enjoy a structured workout that follows a clear sequence, classical Pilates may be your best fit. If you prefer a more personalised and adaptable practice that integrates modern movement science, contemporary Pilates might suit you better. Ultimately, the best Pilates practice is the one that keeps you moving, challenged, and injury-free.
Whether you choose classical, contemporary, or a combination of both, Pilates is an incredible tool for building a strong, resilient body that supports you in daily life. If you are curious about exploring either method, I would happily guide you on your journey!